Is there anything new in nutrition that you haven’t already heard? This week I listened to a neuroscientist talk about the research on glucose and the brain. It’s possible your school cafeteria is hurting your kid’s academic performance. It’s also possible your own brain is in trouble. How? Many who are unwilling to read the research claim that what you eat doesn’t matter very much. They are wrong.
Let’s take the simple (ha!) subject of sugar and your brain.
Is your school cafeteria helping or hurting your kid’s academic performance? Many who are still unwilling to read the research claim that what you eat doesn’t matter very much. They are wrong. Many early studies were not done with a strong experimental protocol or they were done on malnourished kids. But more recent ones have used the “gold standard” in research (blind studies, large sample sizes, cross-over design) and they have found that school nutrition does matter.
Here’s what I learned that was new…
We know that our brain runs on glucose and oxygen. We know the hippocampus needs glucose to learn, but too much is bad. The form of sugar matters to your brain and there are six types of sugar. The two worse forms of sugar are high fructose corn syrup and concentrated fructose. Every single product that lists fructose as an ingredient might be contributing to problems. High fructose sugar impairs memory, but not learning. Moderate-high levels of fructose in your diet will impair neurogenesis (the birth of new neurons). On-going fructose consumption may damage the liver.
Recently, two large and high-quality studies (both randomized, double-blind) used a total of 780 typical, healthy school aged children. All were given either a combination of vitamins and minerals, a supplement of omega-3 essential fats EPA and DHA, or the vitamins and minerals with the omega-3 fats, or a placebo on 6 days a week for 12 months.
At the start of the trial, the children were tested for blood levels of all of these nutrients, all of which significantly improved when they were retested after 12 months. The schoolchildren on the vitamins and minerals had significant improvement in tests of verbal learning and memory. (Osendarp SJ et al., Am J Clin Nutr. 2007).
Another study was testing diets for an eight-week trial comparing a low carb high fat diet (LCHF) with a conventional high carb low fat (HCLF) weight loss diet. Researchers found that the people on the low carb diet lost more weight than those on the low fat diet. But they also had better processing speed in the tests–their brains worked faster! (Halyburton AK et al., Am J Clin Nutr. 2007).
Hint…DO NOT listen to the naysayers. They are behind in their science. Yes, nutrition does matter!
Moderation, as usual, is the key. This research DOES NOT SAY avoid fruits. It says, in general, less fruits are better than more fruits. It says that concentrated fructose (in products and large numbers of fresh fruit) are not good for you. An apple a day is still okay. A banana for lunch is just fine. But vegetables may be better for you than fruit. Fruit sticks or dried fruits are concentrated fructose (bad).
There are many ways educators can reduce the effects of the poor diets that some kids are eating these days.
Brain-based education says, “Be purposeful about it.” Now, go have some fun and make another miracle happen!
Anand,P. Ajaikumar B. Kunnumakara,1 Chitra Sundaram,1 Kuzhuvelil B. Harikumar,1 Sheeja T. Tharakan,1 Oiki S. Lai,1 Bokyung Sung,1 and Bharat B. Aggarwal1,2 (2008) Cancer is a Preventable Disease that Requires Major Lifestyle Changes. Pharmaceutical Research, Vol. 25, No. 9, September, pgs. 2097-2018.
Edmonds CJ, Burford D. Should children drink more water?: the effects of children show improvements in cognitive performance from baseline to test after having a drink of water. Appetite. 2009 Dec;53(3):469-72.
Edmonds CJ, Jeffes B. Does having a drink help you think? 6-7-Year-old. drinking water on cognition in children. Appetite. 2009 Jun;52(3):776-9.
Jacobson, JL and S. W. Jacobson. 1996. Intellectual impairment in children exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls in utero. New England Journal of Medicine 335 (11):783-9.
Jacobson, JL and S. W. Jacobson. 1997. Teratogen Update: Polychlorinated Biphenyls. Teratology 55:338-347.
Patandin, S., C. I. Lanting, P. G. Mulder, E. R. Boersma, P. J. Sauer and N. Weisglas-Kuperus. 1999. Effects of environmental exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and dioxins on cognitive abilities in Dutch children at 42 months of age. Journal of Pediatrics 134 (1):33-41.
Stewart, P. J. Reihman, E. Lonky, T. Darvill and J. Pagano. 2000. Prenatal PCB exposure and neonatal behavioral assessment scale (NBAS) performance. Neurotoxicology and Teratology 22 (1):21-9.
Rogan, WJ, B. C. Gladen, K. L. Hung, S. L. Koong, L. Y. Shih, J. S. Taylor, Y. C. Wu, D. Yang, N. B. Ragan and C. C. Hsu. 1988. Congenital poisoning by polychlorinated biphenyls and their contaminants in Taiwan. Science 241 (4863):334-6.
Ross AP, Bartness TJ, Mielke JG, Parent MB. A high fructose diet impairs spatial memory in male rats. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2009 Oct;92(3):410-6.
Szinnai G, Schachinger H, Arnaud MJ, Linder L, Keller U. Effect of water deprivation on cognitive-motor performance in healthy men and women. Am J Physiol.Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2005 Jul;289(1):R275-80.
Schwabe L, Szinnai G, Keller U, Schachinger H. Dehydration does not influence cardiovascular reactivity to behavioral stress in young healthy humans. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2007 Sep;27(5):291-7.
Valtin, H. (2002). “Drink at least eight glasses of water a day.” Really? Is there scientific evidence for “8 x 8”? American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 283(5), 999–1004.
vom Saal FS, Hughes C. (2005) An extensive new literature concerning low-dose effects of bisphenol A shows the need for a new risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect. Aug;113(8):926-33.
Walkowiak, J. A. Wiener, A. Fastabend, B. Heinzow, U. Kramer, E. Schmidt, H. J. Steingruber, S. Wundram and G. Winneke. 2001. Environmental exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and quality of the home environment: effects on psychodevelopment in early childhood. Lancet 358 (9293):1602-7.
Photo by x-ray delta one